Today I spent about half an hour banging my head against this problem:
Whenever I would try and return a business object, I’d simply get no response from my WCF Service. Litterally nothing.

The problem turned out to be that I had accidentally specified the DataMember Name of a property in a sub object twice.

So, I had my broken class set up like:


[DataContract(Name = "MyClass", Namespace = "Example")]
public partial class MyClass
{
[DataMember(Name = "property1")] public int Property1 { get; set; }
[DataMember(Name = "property1")] public string Property2{ get; set; }
}


An instance of this class was used as a property in another object, which was being returned from WCF.

.NET didn’t throw any sort of error unless I tried to return just “MyClass”.

Sure, it was my fault, but if you have a complex data structure, this could get awefully difficult to find without some sort of message from WCF.

Yes, this is part of that ultra nifty WCF JSON .NET 3.5 Flex project at work.

(A note to readers: This is all pure geek/coder content – Please skip this if nothing in the subject line makes sense)

I started on a new project at work for a client a bit over a week ago, by virtue of the requirements, we decided to investigate the use of new version of Microsoft’s  .NET Framework, Version 3.5, for all of the server-side services.

Microsoft have been quite strongly pushing the benefits of the new features of .NET 3.5. There’s been a few key features which are particularly interesting, and if all goes according to the marketing hype, should end up saving a huge amount of time and effort, whilst ensuring that we use well known and standardised interfaces.

What features?

Windows Communications Foundation (WCF) is particularly interesting because it promises to let you (mostly) remove the whole ‘how’ and ‘where’ portion of communications between tiers, and let you focus on the ‘what’ and ‘when’.

In essence, WCF should let me state that I want to create (say) a Web Service, that accepts information in format X, and outputs responses in some other format. It doesn’t have to be a Web Service either, it could be a Peer to Peer network speaking in straight binary streams.

For this project the client-functionality is all in Flex, so we need to ensure that the Flex guys can quickly decode all the responses and turn them into Action Script objects. Through a bit of experimenting and application prior experience – Web Services speaking JSON appeared to be the easiest and most light weight method of doing this.

Language Integrated Queries (LINQ) is another particularly interesting technology, particularly because it lets me focus on what I want to do with the data I have, rather than spending time transforming it from the Database tables, rows, and procedures, into .NET objects and methods.

There are a number of implementations of LINQ, which enables you to query a variety of sources – the one that I’m most likely to use is LINQ to SQL (talking to SQL Server). Regardless of what I’m accessing however, the syntax is identical – again, removing the need to modify my code if I need to query an XML file, Oracle or MySQL Database, or even native .NET objects.

You can probably see a common theme here – WCF lets me focus on communication with the outside world without needing to write that interface or conversion functionality, and LINQ lets me access and manipulate data, without needing to write that interface either.

So, it’s all plug and play?

Well, that depends entirely on what you’re doing with your data. If you’ve got something like a CRM application where the client is responsible for managing (most of) the data, then yes it can quite possibly be almost plug and play if you’re going with a “CRUD” interface.

If your data structure is more complex, then you need to determine exactly where the split is. In this specific project, I’m presenting an abstracted view of the data that the client needs, and doing all of the business logic to manage data management in the SQL and Web Services Layer.

So far, the whole WCF and LINQ combination looks good. I’m hoping to post some more detailed posts later on.

Further Reading

I highly recommend Scott Guthrie’s LINQ to SQL series of posts. Start with Part 1: Introduction to LINQ to SQL

These resources have also been of a great help in getting my head around the whole LINQ thing:

• Kirk Allen Evans’s Blog : Using WCF, JSON, LINQ, and AJAX: Passing Complex Types to WCF Services with JSON Encoding
• Programming JSON with WCF in .NET Framework 3.5
• LINQ to SQL – 5 Minute Overview – Hooked on LINQ
• WCF + LINQ? – Rudi Grobler
• Talking to WCF with Flex 3 via JSON or XML