<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet Filtering &amp; Censorship in Australia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://will.hughesfamily.net.au/20081030/internet-filtering-censorship-in-australia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://will.hughesfamily.net.au/20081030/internet-filtering-censorship-in-australia/</link>
	<description>Travel, Photography, Geek Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 06:24:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://will.hughesfamily.net.au/20081030/internet-filtering-censorship-in-australia/comment-page-1/#comment-1154</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 04:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://will.hughesfamily.net.au/20081030/internet-filtering-censorship-in-australia/#comment-1154</guid>
		<description>Hi Amanda - I imagine he has the support of the Australian Labour Party leadership.  

From others? Senator Nick Xenophon has expressed support for the plan, as has a Senator from the Family First party whose name escapes me at present. 

Both of these Senators have indicated that they would need the filter exclude additional content - Gambling and certain information on euthenasia, if I recall correctly. 

This &#039;scope creep&#039; of the banned content list is something else that is concerning - that any special interest group with an axe to grind would use their balance of power to get some other type of content added. 

However since I&#039;m certain that the filter will be impossible to implement at the ISP level to filter content anyway, I&#039;m less worried about any plans these groups might have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Amanda &#8211; I imagine he has the support of the Australian Labour Party leadership.  </p>
<p>From others? Senator Nick Xenophon has expressed support for the plan, as has a Senator from the Family First party whose name escapes me at present. </p>
<p>Both of these Senators have indicated that they would need the filter exclude additional content &#8211; Gambling and certain information on euthenasia, if I recall correctly. </p>
<p>This &#8217;scope creep&#8217; of the banned content list is something else that is concerning &#8211; that any special interest group with an axe to grind would use their balance of power to get some other type of content added. </p>
<p>However since I&#8217;m certain that the filter will be impossible to implement at the ISP level to filter content anyway, I&#8217;m less worried about any plans these groups might have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://will.hughesfamily.net.au/20081030/internet-filtering-censorship-in-australia/comment-page-1/#comment-1153</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://will.hughesfamily.net.au/20081030/internet-filtering-censorship-in-australia/#comment-1153</guid>
		<description>&quot;by the Senator and his supporters&quot;

Any idea who these supporters might be??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;by the Senator and his supporters&#8221;</p>
<p>Any idea who these supporters might be??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.185 seconds -->
