<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LINQ to SQL Caching Gotcha</title>
	<atom:link href="http://will.hughesfamily.net.au/20080624/linq-to-sql-caching-gotcha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://will.hughesfamily.net.au/20080624/linq-to-sql-caching-gotcha/</link>
	<description>Travel, Photography, Geek Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 03:07:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://will.hughesfamily.net.au/20080624/linq-to-sql-caching-gotcha/comment-page-1/#comment-1131</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://will.hughesfamily.net.au/?p=910#comment-1131</guid>
		<description>Hi Robin, 

My concerns were really that I&#039;d already just spun up one context to service the request (This is all in a WCF service, by the way) - so spinning up yet another just to bypass a caching method wasn&#039;t my ideal method. 

Mind you, I havn&#039;t found a better way yet. Although I did have a moment where I was tempted to use the crude hack our frontend guys love to use when bypassing caches - adding a nocache param and passing a random value. 

Thanks for the comment, and I&#039;ll keep an eye on your blog too :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robin, </p>
<p>My concerns were really that I&#8217;d already just spun up one context to service the request (This is all in a WCF service, by the way) &#8211; so spinning up yet another just to bypass a caching method wasn&#8217;t my ideal method. </p>
<p>Mind you, I havn&#8217;t found a better way yet. Although I did have a moment where I was tempted to use the crude hack our frontend guys love to use when bypassing caches &#8211; adding a nocache param and passing a random value. </p>
<p>Thanks for the comment, and I&#8217;ll keep an eye on your blog too <img src='http://will.hughesfamily.net.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Clowers</title>
		<link>http://will.hughesfamily.net.au/20080624/linq-to-sql-caching-gotcha/comment-page-1/#comment-1130</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Clowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 03:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://will.hughesfamily.net.au/?p=910#comment-1130</guid>
		<description>I think a new data context makes sense in this situation.  The data context can be used to implement the unit of work pattern, which would lead to a different context per transaction.

Great blog by the way, you may have found a new subscriber!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a new data context makes sense in this situation.  The data context can be used to implement the unit of work pattern, which would lead to a different context per transaction.</p>
<p>Great blog by the way, you may have found a new subscriber!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

